Tying work requirements to public benefits has been described variously as a way to help people end a cycle of relying on handouts, or as a draconian scheme to force needy people off the rolls. Is one of the arguments more correct than the other, or does the truth lie somewhere in the middle?

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

Tying work requirements to public benefits has been described variously as a way to help people end a cycle of relying on handouts, or as a draconian scheme to force needy people off the rolls. Is one of the arguments more correct than the other, or does the truth lie somewhere in the middle?

By - October 16, 2018 at 12:00PM

GLOVER: We can fully employ the next 10 generations of Pennsylvanians rebuilding our cities, towns, and farms so they need a fraction of the fossil fuel. It is less the fault of the unemployed that they have no job than…

Read Entire Article Here: Watchdog National News

via IFTTT