Tying work requirements to public benefits has been described variously as a way to help people end a cycle of relying on handouts, or as a draconian scheme to force needy people off the rolls. Is one of the arguments more correct than the other, or does the truth lie somewhere in the middle?

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

Tying work requirements to public benefits has been described variously as a way to help people end a cycle of relying on handouts, or as a draconian scheme to force needy people off the rolls. Is one of the arguments more correct than the other, or does the truth lie somewhere in the middle?

By - October 17, 2018 at 06:45AM

JARVIS: I believe it's in the middle. Most people on welfare want to be self-sufficient and off the public program but our current system forces them to stay on it by removing benefits completely if they earn $0.25 more than…

Read Entire Article Here: Watchdog National News

via IFTTT